HS-TECH ENGINEERING Co., Ltd.

Why Choose Us: Our Competitive Edge in Thai Regulatory Monitoring

2026-10-04T12:07:00+09:00

Table 1: Thai Regulatory Monitoring

Criteria	Traditional (URL-Based) monitoring	Our Solution (3-Tier Hybrid)
Coverage	Limited to known pages (Risk of missing new sources and documents)	Broad, layered coverage (Extends beyond known sources and formats)
Stability	Disrupted when websites change	Resilient to changes in how information is published
Efficiency	High manual effort from irrelevant alerts	Focused, relevant alerts (Technology-assisted screening reduces manual workload)
Value	Detects surface-level changes only	Actionable insights (Multilingual summaries and expert impact assessment)

Thailand’s chemical and environmental regulatory landscape is both complex and in constant flux. To capture every development with precision and without gaps, HS-TECH Engineering has built a proprietary three-tier monitoring architecture that unites advanced technology with deep domain expertise, safeguarding your compliance posture at every level.

Tier 1: Static Monitoring

A disciplined foundation for tracking priority regulations

Our baseline layer provides systematic, continuous oversight of the sources that matter most across Thailand’s key government agencies, so changes to known, high-impact requirements are captured promptly.

Tier 2: Dynamic Exploration

Extending visibility beyond what is already known

Complementing the baseline, this layer looks beyond predefined sources to identify regulatory developments that conventional approaches can miss, including those that surface as information is reorganized or republished.

Tier 3: Expert Validation

Seasoned judgment that turns technology into actionable answers

However much data automated systems can collect and filter, final risk determination and impact assessment cannot be delegated to technology alone. In this final phase, HS-TECH consultants with an intimate understanding of Thailand’s regulatory history and on-the-ground realities personally validate the findings. They distill signals into genuine insight, delivering sound judgment and an actionable roadmap tied directly to your business objectives.

Get in Touch.

https://hstecheng.com/contact

Is Your SDS Up to Standard? Let Us Review It.

2026-09-30T10:32:00+09:00

Does the SDS for your product accurately reflect its GHS hazard classification?

Is the information consistent across all 16 sections?

HS-TECH not only prepares new SDSs but also provides independent, third-party reviews of your existing ones.

Contact us: https://hstecheng.com/contact

------

Related information;

A shocking and intolerable level of SDS quality

https://hstecheng.com/free/sds-quality

Thai SDS Template is now available

https://hstecheng.com/free/thaisds_template

Thai SDS Authoring Services

https://hstecheng.com/free/thaisds

HS-TECH

https://cdn.goope.jp/21561/260110140348-6961ddb40a213.pdf

7 ปี กากอุตสาหกรรมไทย เปลี่ยนแปลงอย่างไร?

2026-09-25T11:48:00+09:00

จุดเปลี่ยนที่เห็นได้ชัดคือ ปี 2565 เมื่อปริมาณกากที่เข้าสู่ระบบเพิ่มขึ้นอย่างมาก โดยมีกากไม่อันตราย 33.84 ล้านตัน และกากอันตรายประมาณ 2.71 ล้านตัน รวมประมาณ 36.55 ล้านตัน เพิ่มขึ้นจากปี 2564 ถึง 96.82%

หนึ่งในปัจจัยสำคัญคือการนำระบบ E-fully Manifest มาใช้ในการติดตามสิ่งปฏิกูลหรือวัสดุที่ไม่ใช้แล้วตั้งแต่ต้นทางไปจนถึงปลายทาง ช่วยให้การรายงาน การจัดการ และการติดตามกากอุตสาหกรรมเข้าสู่ระบบมีความครอบคลุมมากขึ้น

ดังนั้น เมื่อมองตัวเลขกากอุตสาหกรรมย้อนหลัง 7 ปี เราอาจเห็นเพียงกราฟที่มีตัวเลขเพิ่มขึ้นและลดลง แต่เบื้องหลังตัวเลขเหล่านั้นยังสะท้อนอีกหนึ่งเรื่องสำคัญ นั่นคือ การเปลี่ยนแปลงของระบบจัดการและการติดตามกากอุตสาหกรรมของประเทศไทย

ฉันมองว่า การเพิ่มขึ้นอย่างมากของตัวเลขในปี 2565 อาจเกี่ยวข้องกับการปรับปรุงระบบ รวมถึงความพยายามในการสะสางข้อมูลหรือเอกสารที่ค้างมาจากปีก่อน ๆ ทำให้ข้อมูลกากที่สะสมอยู่หรือรายการที่ยังค้าง ถูกนำเข้าสู่ระบบเป็นจำนวนมากในปีดังกล่าว

ขณะที่ในปี 2566 มีการนำระบบรายงานข้อมูลดิจิทัล iSingle Form มาใช้และกำกับติดตามอย่างเข้มงวดมากขึ้น ควบคู่กับการตรวจสอบและบังคับใช้ที่เข้มข้นขึ้น ทำให้โรงงานต้องจัดการและรายงานข้อมูลกากอุตสาหกรรมภายในระยะเวลาที่กำหนด ซึ่ง อาจเป็นหนึ่งในปัจจัยที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการลดลงของตัวเลขเมื่อเทียบกับปี 2565

(BEE)

ข้อมูลจาก : https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr64-233/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

: DIW Annual Report 2025 | PDF to Flipbook

: https://shorturl.at/Us90P

: https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr64-233/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

: https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr66-307/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

7 Years of Thailand’s Industrial Waste: How Has It Changed?

2026-09-25T11:38:00+09:00

A clear turning point can be observed in 2022 (B.E. 2565), when the amount of waste recorded in the system increased significantly. The volume of non-hazardous waste reached 33.84 million tons, while hazardous waste amounted to approximately 2.71 million tons, bringing the total to approximately 36.55 million tons. This represented an increase of 96.82% compared with 2021(B.E. 2564).

One important factor was the implementation of the E-fully Manifest system, which was introduced to track waste or unused materials from their point of origin through to their final destination. The system helped improve the comprehensiveness of industrial waste reporting, management, and monitoring.

Therefore, when looking at Thailand’s industrial waste figures over the past seven years, we may see only a graph showing numbers rising and falling. However, behind these figures lies another important story: the transformation of Thailand’s industrial waste management and monitoring systems.

In my view, the significant increase in the figures in 2022 may have been related to improvements in the system, as well as efforts to clear or consolidate data and documentation that had remained outstanding from previous years. As a result, accumulated waste records or previously pending entries may have been entered into the system in large numbers during that year.

Meanwhile, in 2023 (B.E. 2566), the digital reporting system iSingle Form was introduced, accompanied by stricter monitoring and enforcement. Factories were required to manage and report their industrial waste data within the specified timeframe. This may have been one of the factors associated with the decline in the recorded figures compared with 2022(B.E. 2565).

Data from : https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr64-233/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

: DIW Annual Report 2025 | PDF to Flipbook

: https://shorturl.at/Us90P

: https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr64-233/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

: https://www.diw.go.th/webdiw/pr66-307/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

(Bee)

Thailand PRTR Act directly affects compliance with the Public Health Act (Revised)

2026-09-23T11:10:00+09:00

Failure to submit PRTR data to the authorities constitutes a violation that can lead to the revocation or refusal of renewal for health hazard business licenses defined by the Public Health Act. Please be reminded that the vast majority of manufacturing facilities qualify as health hazard businesses.

PRTR Act & Public Health Act

Health Hazard Business List

Cat. No.	Category	Item No.	Business / Activity
1	Livestock and pet-related businesses	1	Breeding, raising, and nursing of animals of any kind
		2	Operating a business of keeping or collecting animals, or a similar business, for public viewing or for the benefit of the business, whether or not an admission or service fee is charged directly or indirectly
2	Animals and animal products	1	Slaughtering or butchering animals, except at food-vending premises, mobile vending, or market sales
		2	Curing, tanning, drying, or stockpiling animal hides or fur
		3	Stockpiling unprocessed horns, bones, or animal parts
		4	Rendering/boiling hide, sinew, or animal fat
		5	Manufacturing goods, utensils, or other products (not for food purposes) from shells, carapaces, bones, horns, hides, fur, or other animal parts by boiling, steaming, drying, burning, or any other process
		6	Manufacturing, milling, grinding, crushing, mixing, packing, stockpiling, or otherwise processing animals, plants, or any part thereof, for animal feed or animal-feed ingredients
		7	Producing, processing, stockpiling, or washing lac (shellac resin)
3	Food, beverages, and drinking water (excl. food-vending premises, hawking, market sales, and household consumption production)	1	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking curry paste, ready-made chili paste, fermented soybean paste, soy sauce, dipping sauces, or various seasoning sauces
		2	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking fermented/pickled animal-based foods, e.g. pla-ra, pickled fish, pickled shrimp, sour fish, fermented pork (naem, mum), sausages, shrimp paste, fish sauce, pickled shellfish, or similar products
		3	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking fermented, pickled, or candied food from vegetables, fruit, or other plants
		4	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking food from plants or animals by drying, grinding, steaming, boiling, stewing, simmering, stirring, coating, frying, baking, smoking, grilling, roasting, or any other method
		5	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking meatballs
		6	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking rice vermicelli, khanom chin, noodles, soybean pudding, tofu, glass noodles, kiam-i, meat substitutes, or similar products
		7	Producing egg noodles, macaroni, spaghetti, pasta, or similar products
		8	Producing fresh bread, dried bread, jan-ap, moon cakes, or other baked goods
		9	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking milk or dairy products
		10	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking butter, margarine, blended butter, or related butter/margarine products
		11	Producing ice cream
		12	Roasting, stockpiling, or repacking coffee
		13	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking dried tea leaves, powdered tea, or other powdered beverages
		14	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking ethyl alcohol, liquor, beer, wine, vinegar, khao-mak, or fermented sugar/palm wine
		15	Producing distilled water, potable water, or drinking water from vending machines
		16	Producing, stockpiling, repacking, or transporting ice
		17	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking carbonated drinks, sweetened drinks, soda water, plant/vegetable/fruit drinks, or beverages packed in cans, bottles, or other containers
		18	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking canned, bottled, or other-container-packed food
		19	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking MSG or food additives/seasoning agents
		20	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking sugar or syrup
		21	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking bae-sae (maltose syrup)
		22	Shelling, trimming, or washing aquatic animals, where not part of a cold-storage business
		23	Operating a cold-storage / food-freezing facility
		24	Storing or preserving food using machinery
4	Medicine, medical supplies, medical equipment, cosmetics, and cleaning products	1	Producing, milling, grinding, mixing, or packing medicine/drugs
		2	Producing/packing toothpaste, shampoo, wet wipes, or cosmetics, including body soap
		3	Producing/packing cotton wool or cotton-wool products
		4	Producing bandages, wound dressings, sanitary napkins, or disposable diapers
		5	Producing detergent, soap, cleaning solutions, or other cleaning products
5	Agriculture-related businesses	1	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking vegetable oil
		2	Washing, drying, smoking, or stockpiling raw (unprocessed) rubber
		3	Producing or repacking tapioca starch, sago starch, other plant-derived starch, or similar flour
		4	Milling rice, threshing rice by machine, or repacking rice by any method
		5	Producing tobacco
		6	Polishing, hulling, or grinding grain/seeds
		7	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking fertilizer or fertilizer-production materials
		8	Producing plant fiber
		9	Drying, stockpiling, or transferring cassava, paddy rice, sugarcane, or corn produce
6	Metal or mineral businesses	1	Producing containers, jewelry, tools, equipment, or other utensils from metal or minerals
		2	Smelting ore, or melting/casting metal of any kind, except businesses licensed under 6(1)
		3	Turning/lathing, drilling, welding, forging, cutting, brazing, rolling, or pressing metal by machine, gas, or electricity, except businesses licensed under 6(1)
		4	Coating or plating metal with lead, zinc, tin, chromium, nickel, or other metal, except businesses licensed under 6(1)
		5	Polishing or washing metal by machine or with chemicals, except businesses licensed under 6(1)
		6	Mining, stockpiling, separating, sorting, or washing ore/minerals
7	Motor vehicles, machinery, or mechanical equipment	1	Building, assembling, panel-beating, body-repairing, spray-painting, or applying anti-rust coating to motor vehicles
		2	Manufacturing motor vehicles, machinery, or mechanical equipment
		3	Repairing or tuning engines, machinery, mechanical equipment, electrical systems, air-conditioning systems, or component parts thereof
		4	Operating a motor-vehicle/machinery/mechanical-equipment sales-and-service business that also repairs or refurbishes such vehicles/equipment
		5	Washing, polishing, coating, or lubricating (greasing) motor vehicles
		6	Producing, stockpiling, selling, repairing, or charging batteries
		7	Selling, repairing, patching, or vulcanizing vehicle tires, or wheel alignment/balancing
		8	Producing, repairing, assembling, or pressing brake pads or clutch linings
		9	Stockpiling or repairing old mechanical equipment, old machinery, or component parts of old motor vehicles/machinery/mechanical equipment
8	Wood or paper businesses	1	Producing matches
		2	Sawing, slicing, sanding, planing, drilling, grooving, molding, or cutting wood by machine
		3	Producing, spraying, or applying varnish/paint to finish goods, utensils, or products made of wood, rattan, or bagasse
		4	Kiln-drying wood
		5	Producing, stockpiling, or repacking incense sticks
		6	Producing goods, utensils, stationery, or other products made of paper
		7	Producing various types of paper
		8	Charcoal burning or stockpiling charcoal
9	Service businesses	1	Operating a spa business, except services provided in a medical facility under the law on medical facilities, or in a licensed health-service establishment under the law on health-service establishments
		2	Operating an "aap-op-nuat" (bath-sauna-massage) business
		3	Operating a health-massage business, except services provided in a medical facility, or in a licensed health-service establishment
		4	Operating a bathing facility, steam sauna, or herbal sauna, except services provided in a medical facility, or in a licensed health-service establishment
		5	Operating a hotel, or non-hotel accommodation provided for the temporary lodging of travelers or others for a fee, or similar businesses
		6	Operating a dormitory, rental condominium, rented rooms, or subdivided rented rooms, or similar businesses
		7	Operating a theater / entertainment venue
		8	Providing entertainment shows, music performances, dancing, ramwong, rongeng, discotheque, karaoke, jukebox, or similar entertainment
		9	Operating a swimming pool, or similar business, except services licensed under 9(1)
		10	Operating a skating or rollerblading facility, or similar activities
		11	Operating a beauty salon or hairdressing business, except businesses subject to the law on the practice of the medical profession, or the law on health-service establishments
		12	Operating a fitness / exercise facility
		13	Operating a weight-control service business
		14	Operating an amusement park, bowling alley, or game arcade
		15	Operating a computer / internet service business
		16	Operating a golf course or golf driving range
		17	Operating a medical, public-health, scientific, or environmental laboratory
		18	Operating a tattooing or body-piercing business
		19	Providing childcare services at the client's home
		20	Providing elderly-care services at the client's home
		21	Providing pet spa, bathing, grooming, or temporary pet-boarding services
		22	Operating a container storage yard, or a container-truck-head parking yard
10	Textile businesses	1	Spinning yarn, winding thread, weaving cloth by machine, or weaving with a fly-shuttle loom
		2	Stockpiling jute, hemp, cotton, kapok, or synthetic fiber
		3	Spinning cotton, kapok, or synthetic fiber by machine
		4	Weaving mats, sacks, carpets, or other textiles by machine
		5	Sewing or embroidering cloth or other textiles by machine
		6	Printing on cloth or other textiles
		7	Washing, drying, ironing, or pleating cloth by machine
		8	Dyeing, bleaching, or discharge-printing cloth or other textiles
11	Stone, soil, sand, cement, or similar materials	1	Producing earthenware vessels or terracotta products
		2	Blasting, milling, crushing, or pulverizing stone by machine
		3	Producing goods, utensils, or other products from cement or similar materials
		4	Stockpiling or mixing cement, stone, soil, sand, or construction materials, including excavating, scooping, dredging, milling, crushing, or pulverizing by machine, except businesses licensed under 11(2)
		5	Cutting/faceting diamonds, gemstones, stone, glass, or similar materials
		6	Sawing, cutting, or crafting stone into goods, utensils, or various products
		7	Producing chalk, plaster, lime, dinsopong (white clay), or lime (limestone) burning
		8	Producing products containing asbestos as a component or ingredient
		9	Producing, cutting, or grinding glass or glass products
		10	Producing sandpaper or emery cloth
		11	Producing fiberglass or fiberglass products
		12	Washing or sandblasting the surface of glass, stone, or other materials, except businesses licensed under 6(5)
12	Petroleum, petrochemicals, coal, coke, and various chemicals	1	Producing, stockpiling, packing, or transporting acids, alkalis, oxidizing agents, or solvents
		2	Producing, stockpiling, packing, or transporting gas
		3	Producing, stockpiling, refining, or transporting petroleum or petroleum products
		4	Producing, stockpiling, or transporting coal or coke
		5	Spray-painting, except businesses licensed under 7(1)
		6	Producing goods, utensils, or products from synthetic rubber, plastic, celluloid, bakelite, or similar materials
		7	Milling, stockpiling, or grinding resin/pitch (chan)
		8	Producing paint or paint-mixing oil
		9	Producing or developing/washing photographic film or motion-picture film
		10	Coating or dipping objects with plastic, celluloid, bakelite, or similar materials
		11	Producing plastic, celluloid, bakelite, or similar materials
		12	Producing or packing fire-extinguishing chemicals
		13	Producing dry ice
		14	Producing, stockpiling, or transporting fireworks, or chemicals that are components in fireworks production
		15	Producing shellac or varnish
		16	Producing, stockpiling, packing, or transporting pesticides or disease-vector control agents
		17	Producing, stockpiling, or packing glue/adhesive
13	Other businesses	1	Printing books or similar publications by machine
		2	Manufacturing or repairing electronic devices, electrical appliances, electronic components, or electrical equipment
		3	Producing candles or similar materials
		4	Blueprint printing or photocopying
		5	Stockpiling damaged, used, or surplus materials/goods
		6	Operating a warehouse
		7	Washing used bottles, containers, or packaging for reuse or reprocessing into new products
		8	Printing, writing, spray-painting, or applying other methods to non-textile objects
		9	Operating a fishing-boat pier, fish-market pier, or fish raft/platform
		10	Packing goods by machine
		11	Providing pest-control services for insects or disease-vector animals
		12	Producing goods, utensils, or products from rubber
		13	Producing, stockpiling, or transporting biodiesel and ethanol
		14	Operating an edible bird's-nest (swiftlet) business, and cleaning or trimming swiftlet nests

Thailand PRTR Act, drafted and public consultation until September 30th

2026-09-19T12:28:00+09:00

A public consultation for the enactment of the new “PRTR (Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) Act,” which is a prerequisite for OECD membership, is open from August 10 to September 30, 2026, at the following website: https://ethics.parliament.go.th/section77/survey_detail.php?id=614　　.

1. Key Points of the Draft PRTR Act (Basic Law)　　

Covered Facilities

Facilities (e.g., factories) that manufacture, possess, release into the environment, or transfer designated “target pollutants and chemicals” in quantities exceeding specified thresholds　　. Note that the specific pollutants and chemicals are not yet defined in this draft.

Reporting Obligations　　

Each covered facility must report the manufactured and possessed quantities of target substances, their release into the environment (air, water, soil, etc.), and their transfer as waste or wastewater. These reports must be submitted to the Pollution Control Department (PCD) under the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment at least once a year.

Public Disclosure　　

The collected data—including release and transfer volumes, facility locations, and business types—will be compiled into a database. Citizens will have easy and free access to this database.

Protection of Trade Secrets　　

If disclosing specific chemical names or possessed quantities would cause commercial disadvantage, businesses can file a request for non-disclosure citing “trade secrets”. If approved, a generic “chemical group name” can be used in place of the specific substance name for public disclosure.

Penalties　　

Failure to fulfill reporting obligations or comply with corrective orders will result in an administrative fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 THB, with an additional maximum daily fine of 50,000 THB while the violation continues.

Administrative Penalties: Failure to report or comply with regulatory orders carries a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 THB, plus an additional fine of up to 50,000 THB per day until compliance is achieved.
Criminal Penalties: Submitting false information or concealing facts is punishable by imprisonment for up to 2 years, a fine of 500,000 to 5,000,000 THB, or both. In cases of corporate violations, directors or managers who issued the instructions are also subject to punishment.

2. Impact on Chemical Handling Businesses (Factories)　　

Increased Compliance and Operational Costs　　

Businesses will need to establish systems for accurately measuring, calculating, and reporting release and transfer volumes, conduct testing and registration, and assign dedicated staff. This is expected to significantly increase administrative burdens and operational costs.

Reputation Risks from Public Disclosure　　

Because emission data will be publicly available, environmental scrutiny from local residents and NGOs will intensify.
High emission levels carry the risk of damaging the corporate image and provoking community backlash, necessitating strict accountability regarding environmental initiatives.

Strict Obligations for Intellectual Property Protection　　

Companies must carefully navigate the balance between public disclosure and maintaining corporate secrets.
To prevent the leakage of highly confidential chemical information (such as product formulations), companies must proactively file for “trade secret” protection and establish robust internal governance structures to substantiate these claims.

Severe Legal Risks for Management (Urgent Need to Strengthen Governance)　　

Strict provisions are in place, meaning violations such as false reporting can lead not only to corporate fines but also to personal criminal penalties (e.g., imprisonment) for the executive management.
Consequently, managing these obligations cannot be left solely to frontline staff; there is an urgent need to build a rigorous, top-management-driven chemical management and auditing framework (compliance system).

3. Pending Clarifications (Unconfirmed Matters)　　

Target Pollutants　　

The current draft does not explicitly list the specific pollutants and chemicals to be targeted.
It only defines the “criteria (properties)” for targeted substances, which include carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxicants, chronic toxicants, substances harmful to ecosystems, ozone-depleting substances, and persistent organic pollutants (POPs).
The specific substance lists are expected to be clarified in future notifications from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.

Definition of Target Facilities　　

The exact definition of covered facilities is not clarified in the current draft.
This is also expected to be detailed in future Ministry notifications.

4. Implementation Timeline　　

In principle, the act will take effect on the day following its publication in the Royal Gazette.
Provisions regarding non-point sources (mobile sources) will take effect two years after publication.

5. Transitional Measures　　

The draft stipulates that within five years of the law’s enforcement, the application of designated areas will be expanded to cover all regions nationwide.

Potential Target Pollutants and Chemicals (Historical Reference)

The target substances from the PRTR pilot project—conducted jointly by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Ministry of Industry, and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, and in which we were also involved—are shown in Table 1.

Please contact us if you need the rationale behind selecting these chemical substances through the Inquiry site.

https://hstecheng.com/contact

Table 1: PRTR substances list in the past

No.	Name of Chemical substance	Molecula Formula	CAS No.
1	Acetaldehyde	CH3CHO	75-07-0
2	Acetone	C3H6O	67-64-1
3	Acrylamide	C3H5NO	6-1-1979
4	Acrylic Acid	C3H4O2	1-6-1798
5	Acrylonitrile	C3H3N	107-13-1
6	Ametryn	C9H17N5S	834-12-8
7	Antimony and its compunds	NA	1309-64-4
7	Antimony trisulfide	NA	1345-04-6
8	Arsenic and its compounds	NA	7440-38-2
8	Arsenobetaine and other organic arsenic compounds	NA	64436-13-1
8	Dimethylarsenic acid	NA	75-60-5
9	Atrazine	C8H14ClN5	1912-24-9
10	Benzene	C6H6	71-43-2
11	Benzyl Chloride	C7H7Cl	100-44-7
12	Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate	C24H38O4	117-81-7
13	Bisphenol A	C15H16O2	5-7-1980
14	Boron and its compounds	NA	NA
15	1-Bromo-2-chloroethane,	CH2BrCl	107-04-0
16	BUTACHLOR	C17H26ClNO2	23184-66-9
17	Butadiene,1,3-	C4H6	106-99-0
18	Cadmium and its compounds	NA	7440-43-9
19	Captan	C9H8Cl3NO2S	133-06-2
20	Carbon Disulfide	CS2	75-15-0
21	Chloroacetaldehyde, 2-	C2H3ClO	107-20-0
22	Chloroacetic Acid	C2H3ClO2	11-8-1979
23	Chloroform (trichloromethane)	CHCl3	67-66-3
24	Chlorothalonil	C8Cl4N2	1897-45-6
25	Chlorpyrifos	C9H11Cl3NO3PS	2921-88-2
26	Chromium and its componds	Cr	NA
26	Chromium (III) compounds	NA	16065-83-1
26	Chromium (VI) compounds	NA	18540-29-9
26	Chromium, metallic	NA	7440-47-3
27	Copper and soluble salts	Cu	NA
27	Copper 8-hydroxyquinoline	NA	10380-28-6
28	Cyclohexanone	C6H10O	108-94-1
29	D-BUTOTYL,2,4-	C14H18Cl2O4	1929-73-3
30	D-BUTYL,2,4-	C12H14Cl2O3	94-80-4
31	D-DIMETHYLAMMONIUM ,2, 4-	C10H13Cl2NO3	2008-39-1
32	DIALIFOS(DIALIFOR)	C14H17ClNO4PS2	10311-84-9
33	Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-	C6H4Cl2	106-46-7
34	Dichloroethane, 1,2-	C2H4Cl2	107-06-2
35	Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid, 2,4-	C8H6Cl2O3	94-75-7
36	Dichlorvos	C4H7Cl2O4P	62-73-7
37	Diethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether	C8H18O3	112-34-5
38	DITHIOPYR	C15H16F5NO2S2	97886-45-8
39	Epichlorohydrin	C3H5ClO	106-89-8
40	Ethyl Acetate	C4H8O2	141-78-6
41	Ethyl Acrylate	C5H8O2	140-88-5
42	Ethylene Glycol	C2H6O2	107-21-1
43	Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether	C6H14O2	111-76-2
44	Ethylene Oxide	C2H4O	75-21-8
45	Formaldehyde	CH2O	50-00-0
46	Formic Acid	CH2O2	64-18-6
47	Furfural	C5H4O2	1-1-1998
48	GLYPHOSATE-ISOPROPYLAMMONIUM	C6H17N2O5P	38641-94-0
49	Hexachlorocyclohexane	C6H6Cl6	319-86-8
50	Hexane, N-	C6H14	110-54-3
51	Hexanedioic Acid	C6H10O4	124-04-9
52	Hydrogen Fluoride	HF	7664-39-3
53	Hydroquinone	C6H6O2	123-31-9
54	IMAZAQUIN-AMMONIUM	C17H20N4O3	81335-47-9
55	Isobutyl Alcohol	C4H10O	78-83-1
56	Isophorone	-	78-59-1
57	Isopropyl alcohol	C3H8O	67-63-0
58	Lead and Compounds	Pb	7439-92-1
59	Maleic Anhydride	C4H2O3	108-31-6
60	Managenses and its compounds	NA	NA
61	Methanol	CH4O	67-56-1
62	(p-METHOXYPHENYL)-2-METHYL-1,3- PROPANEDIOL-METHYLENE ETHER ,1-	-	5689-72-5
63	Methyl Acetate	C3H6O2	79-20-9
64	Methyl Acrylate	C4H6O2	96-33-3
65	Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)	C4H8O	78-93-3
66	Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)	C6H12O	108-10-1
67	Methyl Methacrylate	C5H8O2	80-62-6
68	Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)	C5H12O	1634-04-4
69	Methylene Chloride	CH2Cl2	9-2-1975
70	Methylenediphenyl Diisocyanate	C15H10N2O2	101-68-8
71	Molybdenum and its compounds	NA	NA
72	Naphthalene	C10H8	91-20-3
73	Nickel and its compounds	NA	NA
74	Paraquat Dichloride	C12H14Cl2N2	1910-42-5
75	Pentane, n-	C5H12	109-66-0
76	Phenol	C6H6O	108-95-2
77	Phosphoric Acid	H3PO4	7664-38-2
78	Phosphorus pentoxide and other	P2O5	1314-56-3
79	Phthalic Anhydride	C8H4O3	85-44-9
80	Polyethylene glycol nonylphenyl ether	C19H32O3	9016-45-9
81	Potassium chlorate	ClKO3	4-9-3811
82	Propanil	C9H9Cl2NO	709-98-8
83	PROPIONICACID	C3H6O2	9-4-1979
84	Propylene	C3H6	115-07-1
85	Propylene Glycol	C3H8O2	57-55-6
86	Propylene Oxide	C3H6O	75-56-9
87	PROTHIOCARB	C8H19ClN2OS	19622-08-3
88	Pyrene	C16H10	129-00-0
89	Ryania	C25H35NO9	15662-33-6
90	sodium chlorate	ClNaO3	7775-9-9
91	Sodium Cyanide	NaCN	143-33-9
92	Styrene	C8H8	100-42-5
93	Tebuthiuron	C9H16N4OS	34014-18-1
94	Tetrachloroethylene	C2Cl4	127-18-4
95	Tin and its compounds	NA	NA
96	Toluene	CH3C6H5	108-88-3
97	Trichloroethylene	C2HCl3	1-6-1979
98	Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-	C9H12	95-63-6
99	Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-	C9H12	108-67-8
100	Trinitrotoluene, 2,4,6-	C7H5N3O6	118-96-7
101	Vinyl Acetate	C4H6O2	108-05-4
102	Vinyl Chloride	C2H3Cl	1975-01-4
103	Xylenes	CH3C6H5	1330-20-7
104	Zinc and its compounds	NA	NA
105	Sox	NA	NA
106	NOx	NA	NA
107	Dioxin and Furan	NA	NA
107	2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin	NA	1746-01-6
107	Dibenzo-para-dioxin	NA	262-12-4
107	Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),	NA	NA
107	3,4,5,3’,4’-Pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126)	NA	57465-28-8
107	Furan	NA	110-00-9

OECD加盟に向けた新たな”PRTR法案”のパブリックコメント募集(9月30日まで）

2026-09-19T12:09:00+09:00

タイ国 PRTR基本法案の要点

OECD加盟に必須の新たな「PRTR法案（化学物質排出移動登録法案）」の制定に向けた意見公募（パブリックコンサルテーション）が、2026年8月10日から9月30日まで、

下記のサイトで受け付けている。 https://ethics.parliament.go.th/section77/survey_detail.php?id=614

PRTR法案の要点を下記に示した。

PRTR法案（基本法）の要点

対象となる事業者

指定された「対象となる汚染物質および化学物質」を規定量以上で製造、保有、環境への放出、または移動させる事業所（工場など）。ただし、汚染物質および化学物質は、本法案では指定されていない。

報告義務

事業所ごとに、対象物質の製造量、保有量、環境（大気、水、土壌など）への放出量、および廃棄物や廃水としての移動量を、少なくとも年に1回、天然資源環境省公害管理局に報告

情報公開

収集されたデータ（放出・移動量、事業所の位置情報、事業の種類など）はデータベース化され、市民が容易かつ無償でアクセス可

営業秘密の保護

特定の化学物質名や保有量が公開されると商業上の不利益を被る場合、事業者は「営業秘密」として情報の非公開を申し立てることができる。これが認められた場合、一般公開時には個別の物質名の代わりに「化学物質グループ名」の使用可

罰則

報告義務の不履行や是正命令に従わない場合は、20万〜100万バーツの行政罰金（違反継続中は日量最大5万バーツの追加）が科される。

行政罰報告の不履行や監督機関の命令に従わない場合、20万〜100万バーツの罰金が科され、正しく履行されるまで1日あたり最大5万バーツの罰金が追加
刑事罰虚偽情報の報告や事実の隠ぺいを行った場合は、2年以下の禁錮、または50万〜500万バーツの罰金、あるいはその両方が科される。法人による違反の場合、指示をした取締役や管理者等も処罰の対象

化学物質取扱事業者（工場）へのインパクト

コンプライアンスおよび運用コストの増大

事業者は排出量や移動量を正確に測定・算出・報告するためのシステム構築、試験・登録作業、および専任スタッフの配置などを行う必要があり、大幅な実務負担とコスト増が予想される。

情報公開に伴うレピュテーションリスク

排出状況が市民に公開されるため、周辺住民やNGOなどからの環境監視の目が厳しくなる。
放出量が多いと企業イメージの低下や地域社会からの反発を招くリスクがあり、環境対応に向けた高度な説明責任が求められる。

知的財産保護の徹底義務

情報公開と企業秘密保持のバランスをとることが求められる。
製品のレシピなど機密性の高い化学物質情報が流出するのを防ぐため、企業側は自ら積極的に「営業秘密」としての申立てを行い、その根拠を立証するための社内体制整備

経営層の重い法的リスク（ガバナンス強化の急務）

虚偽報告等の違反が発生した際、罰金だけでなく経営陣個人の刑事罰（禁錮刑など）につながる厳しい規定が設定。
そのため、現場任せにせず、経営トップが関与する厳格な化学物質管理・監査体制（コンプライアンス体制）の構築が急務

未確認事項

対象となる汚染物質

現在の法案では、対象となる具体的な汚染物質名および化学物質（リスト）はまだ明確化されていない。
対象とする物質の「基準（性質）」のみが定められており、発がん性物質、変異原性物質、生殖毒性物質、慢性毒性物質、生態系への有害物質、オゾン層破壊物質、残留性有機汚染物質などが該当する。
今後、天然資源環境省・告示等で明確化されるのだろう。

対象事業所の定義

現在の法案では明確化されていない。
今後、天然資源環境省・告示等で明確化されるのだろう。

施行時期

原則として官報での公示の翌日から
非点源（移動発生源）に関する規定は、公示から2年後

経過措置

本法の施行後、5年以内に全国の地域を網羅するよう指定区域の適用を拡大していくことが規定

対象となる可能性のある汚染物質および化学物質（過去からの参考）

当方も参画した、国際協力機構(Japan International Cooperation Agency:JICA)、工業省、天然資源環境省による　「PRTRパイロットプロジェクト」　で対象とした物質を Table 1 に示した。

Table 1: PRTR substances list in the past

No.	Name of Chemical substance	Molecula Formula	CAS No.
1	Acetaldehyde	CH3CHO	75-07-0
2	Acetone	C3H6O	67-64-1
3	Acrylamide	C3H5NO	6-1-1979
4	Acrylic Acid	C3H4O2	1-6-1798
5	Acrylonitrile	C3H3N	107-13-1
6	Ametryn	C9H17N5S	834-12-8
7	Antimony and its compunds	NA	1309-64-4
7	Antimony trisulfide	NA	1345-04-6
8	Arsenic and its compounds	NA	7440-38-2
8	Arsenobetaine and other organic arsenic compounds	NA	64436-13-1
8	Dimethylarsenic acid	NA	75-60-5
9	Atrazine	C8H14ClN5	1912-24-9
10	Benzene	C6H6	71-43-2
11	Benzyl Chloride	C7H7Cl	100-44-7
12	Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate	C24H38O4	117-81-7
13	Bisphenol A	C15H16O2	5-7-1980
14	Boron and its compounds	NA	NA
15	1-Bromo-2-chloroethane,	CH2BrCl	107-04-0
16	BUTACHLOR	C17H26ClNO2	23184-66-9
17	Butadiene,1,3-	C4H6	106-99-0
18	Cadmium and its compounds	NA	7440-43-9
19	Captan	C9H8Cl3NO2S	133-06-2
20	Carbon Disulfide	CS2	75-15-0
21	Chloroacetaldehyde, 2-	C2H3ClO	107-20-0
22	Chloroacetic Acid	C2H3ClO2	11-8-1979
23	Chloroform (trichloromethane)	CHCl3	67-66-3
24	Chlorothalonil	C8Cl4N2	1897-45-6
25	Chlorpyrifos	C9H11Cl3NO3PS	2921-88-2
26	Chromium and its componds	Cr	NA
26	Chromium (III) compounds	NA	16065-83-1
26	Chromium (VI) compounds	NA	18540-29-9
26	Chromium, metallic	NA	7440-47-3
27	Copper and soluble salts	Cu	NA
27	Copper 8-hydroxyquinoline	NA	10380-28-6
28	Cyclohexanone	C6H10O	108-94-1
29	D-BUTOTYL,2,4-	C14H18Cl2O4	1929-73-3
30	D-BUTYL,2,4-	C12H14Cl2O3	94-80-4
31	D-DIMETHYLAMMONIUM ,2, 4-	C10H13Cl2NO3	2008-39-1
32	DIALIFOS(DIALIFOR)	C14H17ClNO4PS2	10311-84-9
33	Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-	C6H4Cl2	106-46-7
34	Dichloroethane, 1,2-	C2H4Cl2	107-06-2
35	Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid, 2,4-	C8H6Cl2O3	94-75-7
36	Dichlorvos	C4H7Cl2O4P	62-73-7
37	Diethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether	C8H18O3	112-34-5
38	DITHIOPYR	C15H16F5NO2S2	97886-45-8
39	Epichlorohydrin	C3H5ClO	106-89-8
40	Ethyl Acetate	C4H8O2	141-78-6
41	Ethyl Acrylate	C5H8O2	140-88-5
42	Ethylene Glycol	C2H6O2	107-21-1
43	Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether	C6H14O2	111-76-2
44	Ethylene Oxide	C2H4O	75-21-8
45	Formaldehyde	CH2O	50-00-0
46	Formic Acid	CH2O2	64-18-6
47	Furfural	C5H4O2	1-1-1998
48	GLYPHOSATE-ISOPROPYLAMMONIUM	C6H17N2O5P	38641-94-0
49	Hexachlorocyclohexane	C6H6Cl6	319-86-8
50	Hexane, N-	C6H14	110-54-3
51	Hexanedioic Acid	C6H10O4	124-04-9
52	Hydrogen Fluoride	HF	7664-39-3
53	Hydroquinone	C6H6O2	123-31-9
54	IMAZAQUIN-AMMONIUM	C17H20N4O3	81335-47-9
55	Isobutyl Alcohol	C4H10O	78-83-1
56	Isophorone	-	78-59-1
57	Isopropyl alcohol	C3H8O	67-63-0
58	Lead and Compounds	Pb	7439-92-1
59	Maleic Anhydride	C4H2O3	108-31-6
60	Managenses and its compounds	NA	NA
61	Methanol	CH4O	67-56-1
62	(p-METHOXYPHENYL)-2-METHYL-1,3- PROPANEDIOL-METHYLENE ETHER ,1-	-	5689-72-5
63	Methyl Acetate	C3H6O2	79-20-9
64	Methyl Acrylate	C4H6O2	96-33-3
65	Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)	C4H8O	78-93-3
66	Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)	C6H12O	108-10-1
67	Methyl Methacrylate	C5H8O2	80-62-6
68	Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)	C5H12O	1634-04-4
69	Methylene Chloride	CH2Cl2	9-2-1975
70	Methylenediphenyl Diisocyanate	C15H10N2O2	101-68-8
71	Molybdenum and its compounds	NA	NA
72	Naphthalene	C10H8	91-20-3
73	Nickel and its compounds	NA	NA
74	Paraquat Dichloride	C12H14Cl2N2	1910-42-5
75	Pentane, n-	C5H12	109-66-0
76	Phenol	C6H6O	108-95-2
77	Phosphoric Acid	H3PO4	7664-38-2
78	Phosphorus pentoxide and other	P2O5	1314-56-3
79	Phthalic Anhydride	C8H4O3	85-44-9
80	Polyethylene glycol nonylphenyl ether	C19H32O3	9016-45-9
81	Potassium chlorate	ClKO3	4-9-3811
82	Propanil	C9H9Cl2NO	709-98-8
83	PROPIONICACID	C3H6O2	9-4-1979
84	Propylene	C3H6	115-07-1
85	Propylene Glycol	C3H8O2	57-55-6
86	Propylene Oxide	C3H6O	75-56-9
87	PROTHIOCARB	C8H19ClN2OS	19622-08-3
88	Pyrene	C16H10	129-00-0
89	Ryania	C25H35NO9	15662-33-6
90	sodium chlorate	ClNaO3	7775-9-9
91	Sodium Cyanide	NaCN	143-33-9
92	Styrene	C8H8	100-42-5
93	Tebuthiuron	C9H16N4OS	34014-18-1
94	Tetrachloroethylene	C2Cl4	127-18-4
95	Tin and its compounds	NA	NA
96	Toluene	CH3C6H5	108-88-3
97	Trichloroethylene	C2HCl3	1-6-1979
98	Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-	C9H12	95-63-6
99	Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-	C9H12	108-67-8
100	Trinitrotoluene, 2,4,6-	C7H5N3O6	118-96-7
101	Vinyl Acetate	C4H6O2	108-05-4
102	Vinyl Chloride	C2H3Cl	1975-01-4
103	Xylenes	CH3C6H5	1330-20-7
104	Zinc and its compounds	NA	NA
105	Sox	NA	NA
106	NOx	NA	NA
107	Dioxin and Furan	NA	NA
107	2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin	NA	1746-01-6
107	Dibenzo-para-dioxin	NA	262-12-4
107	Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),	NA	NA
107	3,4,5,3’,4’-Pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB-126)	NA	57465-28-8
107	Furan	NA	110-00-9

以上

OEDC加盟に向けた、危険物貯蔵施設に関する調査(タイ工業省産業規制局: DIW)

2026-09-15T10:48:00+09:00

タイは2028年末までのOECD加盟を目指し、包括的な法制度改革を加速させています。HS-TECHエンジニアリングは、日本の化学物質管理専門の月刊誌に寄稿した記事にて、こうした一連の取り組みを詳しく紹介しました。

(参考:「HS-TECHエンジニアリング、化学物質管理専門の日本の月刊誌に記事を寄稿」— https://hstecheng.com/info/6874109)

このたび、タイ工業省工場局(DIW)はOECD加盟に向けた「危険物貯蔵施設に関するweb上での調査」を実施しました。

なお、この調査は9月7日で締め切られました。

本調査における各パートの要点は以下のとおり。

第1部・第2部(基本情報・化学物質に関する理解)
貯蔵目的、担当責任者、GHS分類(2009年版以降)の採用状況を評価します。特に、ドイツの危険物取扱いに関する技術規則である「TRGS 510」について、事業者側の認知度と実務における運用状況を把握している点に注目。

第3部~第5部(施設、安全保管庫、少量貯蔵)
耐火壁や防液堤等の構造面の安全基準への適合状況、認証済み安全保管庫の使用実態、さらに少量の化学物質を貯蔵する際に生じるスペースの制約や導入コストの高さといった固有の課題を評価。

第6部(混載・混合貯蔵)
国連危険物輸送に関する勧告(UN RTDG)やDIWガイドラインなど国際的な指針を参照しながら、混載不適合物質の分離基準に対する事業者の遵守状況を調査。

第7部(一時保管エリア)
一時保管エリアにおける管理措置を検証し、厳格な時間・数量制限の設定、区画表示、ラベルおよびSDSの完備状況を確認。

第8部(固定貯槽)
地下タンク・地上タンクの安全対策を検証し、二重殻構造、容量の100~110%に相当する防液堤、NFPA 70またはUN番号を表示した警告標識の掲示といった基準を重視。

第9部(新ハンドブックへの提言)
自由記述形式で意見を収集し、新規制への対応にあたって事業者が必要とする政府支援(専門家によるアドバイス、実用的なテンプレートなど)を具体的に把握。

「化学物質貯蔵基準の近代化(OECD国際基準との整合)」との関係

本調査は、2028年のOECD加盟に向けて国内規制を国際基準へ整合させようとするタイ国・DIWの動きを直接反映したものです。ドイツの「TRGS 510」、「UN RTDG」、米国の「NFPA 70」といった厳格な国際基準を調査項目に明示的に組み込むことで、DIWは国内の現行慣行を国際的な水準と積極的に照らし合わせていると考えられます。

化学品を取り扱う事業者が直面する実務上・費用面での制約を丁寧に把握していることからは、DIWが近代化された規制枠組みと改訂版ハンドブックの整備を慎重に進めている様子がうかがえます。タイ国内事業者の現状の対応能力と国際的に厳格な貯蔵基準との間のギャップを埋めることで、今後予定される法改正においてOECD基準への適合と国内産業における実行可能性の両立を図ろうとしています。

ご質問は下記へ

https://hstecheng.com/contact

Hazardous Materials Storage Facility Survey by The Department of Industrial Works, DIW Thailand

2026-09-12T18:07:00+09:00

Thailand is accelerating comprehensive legal reforms as it aims to join the OECD by the end of 2028. HS-TECH ENGINEERING recently detailed these ongoing efforts in an article contributed to a Japanese monthly journal specializing in chemical management.

(Reference: HS-TECH ENGINEERING Contributes Article to the Japanese Monthly Chemical Management Journal - https://hstecheng.com/info/6874109)

Most recently, the Department of Industrial Works (DIW) conducted a web-based "Hazardous Materials Storage Facility Survey."

Jut note that the Survey closed on September 7th.

---

The key points of this survey by Part are outlined below.

Parts 1-2 (General Info & Understanding of Chemicals): Assesses storage purposes, responsible personnel, and the adoption of GHS classifications (version 2009 or newer). Notably, it gauges operators' awareness and practical application of TRGS 510, the German Technical Rules for Hazardous Substances.

Parts 3-5 (Facilities, Safety Cabinets, & Small Quantities): Evaluates structural safety compliance (e.g., fire-rated walls, containment pits), the use of certified safety cabinets, and the specific challenges of storing small quantities of chemicals, such as space constraints and high implementation costs.

Part 6 (Mixed/Combined Storage): Investigates operators' adherence to segregation criteria for incompatible substances, referencing international guidelines like the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN RTDG) and DIW guidelines.

Part 7 (Temporary Staging Areas): Examines control measures for temporary storage areas, checking for strict time and quantity limits, boundary markings, and the availability of complete labels and SDS.

Part 8 (Fixed Stationary Tanks): Reviews safety protocols for underground and above-ground tanks, emphasizing standards like double-wall construction, 100-110% capacity secondary containment berms, and the display of NFPA 70 or UN number warning signs.

Part 9 (Suggestions for the New Handbook): Collects open feedback and identifies exactly what government assistance operators need (e.g., expert advice, practical templates) to adapt to new regulations.

Relationship to the "Modernization of Chemical Storage Standards (Harmonization with International Norms)"

The survey is a direct reflection of Thailand's momentum toward harmonizing local regulations with global norms to prepare for OECD membership by 2028. By explicitly incorporating strict international standards—such as Germany's "TRGS 510", the "UN RTDG", and the US "NFPA 70"—into the questionnaire, the DIW is actively benchmarking current domestic practices against global expectations.

Assessing the practical and financial limitations faced by operators indicates that DIW is carefully preparing a modernized regulatory framework and an updated handbook. They are attempting to bridge the gap between current local capabilities and stringent international storage norms, ensuring the upcoming legal reform is both compliant with OECD standards and practical for domestic industries.

A shocking and intolerable level of SDS quality

2026-09-12T10:55:00+09:00

We have recently observed a significant increase in requests for SDS preparation in Thai and English.　A thorough review of the current SDSs revealed that not a single document met our quality thresholds based on the GHS criteria.

In the majority of cases, the rationale behind the hazard classifications in Sections 2 : Hazards identification and 3 : Composition/information on ingredientsis entirely unaddressed in Section 11: Toxicological information, despite the documents being signed and validated by third-party organizations.

Classifying a health hazard like Carcinogenicity X without providing supporting data, information within the SDS is a critical failure in regulatory compliance at some authorities.

We urge clients not to choose a regulatory consultancy based solely only on price.

目を覆う看過できないSDS品質レベル

2026-09-12T10:43:00+09:00

最近、タイ語SDS、英語SDS作成に関する引き合いが顕著に増えている。

入手した現行SDSを精査すると、全てのSDSの品質は弊社の合格ラインに到達していなかった。

例えば、セクション２:危険有害性の要約，セクション3：組成及び成分情報で付与された有害性区分を裏付ける根拠が、セクション11：有害性情報等で全く言及されていなかった。それにもかかわらず、外部機関がそのSDSに署名をしているなど、まるでコントだ。

特に、発がん性区分Xを付与したにもかかわらず、その根拠をSDS中で示していない事例などは、論外だ。

SDS作成費用の多寡だけで、コンサル企業を選ばないでほしい。

Request on Quotation / SDS preparation for clients

2026-09-10T20:07:00+09:00

Table 1: Request for quotation and SDS preparation

No	Item.Requested.for.client	Notes	For.the.quotation	For.the.SDS.preparation
1	Product name, code, and trade name	Include any alternate/trade names	Yes	Yes
2	Company name, address, Tax ID	Legal entity and registration details	Yes	Yes
3	Manufacturer / supplier details	If different from customer	Yes	Yes
4	Required delivery date	Deadline for the completed SDS	Yes	Yes
5	Required language(s)	For the final SDS	Yes	Yes
6	Format requirement	e.g., 16-section GHS format, or specific regional template	Yes	Yes
7	Version of GHS	3, 6, 7, 9,	Yes	Yes
8	Certificate of Analysis (COA)	Latest batch	No	Yes
9	Existing SDS (if any)	Original language and/or English version	No	Yes
10	Full ingredients list	With CAS No. and concentration (%) of each component	No	Yes
11	Intended use / application	How the product will be used	No	Yes
12	Emergency contact number	24-hour contact, if available	No	Yes
13	Country(ies) of sale / distribution	Determines applicable regulation: OSHA, CLP, GHS, WHMIS, etc.	No	Yes
14	Physical/chemical property data	pH, flash point, boiling point, density, solubility, etc. (if available)	No	Yes
15	Toxicological / safety test data	If available	No	Yes
16	Transport classification info	UN No., packing group, hazard class — or confirm "not regulated"	No	Yes
17	Product specification / technical data sheet (TDS)	NA	No	Yes
18	Sample product label	If already designed	No	Yes
19	Previous SDS revision / history	If this is an update rather than a new SDS	No	Yes

Pollution breaches by factory could bring immediate shutdowns the factory under the new i-Auditor

2026-09-03T15:48:00+09:00

The Ministry of Industry is transforming factory oversight into Data-Driven Regulation, using data and digital technology to assess risks and identify irregularities, enabling more targeted and effective inspections.

One of the key tools is i-Auditor, a digital system that enables officials to record inspection results, attach evidence, prepare reports, and systematically track corrective actions. The system helps reduce paperwork and promotes greater consistency in factory inspections.

Factories Violating Pollution Standards May Face Immediate Shutdowns

A key change is the strengthened enforcement of regulations against factories that release pollutants above prescribed standards or fail to properly manage industrial waste.

In the past, when a factory caused pollution by discharging wastewater or air pollutants beyond legal limits, officials from the Department of Industrial Works (DIW) could order the factory to take corrective action within a specified period under the first paragraph of Section 37 of the Factory Act.

Under the new proactive regulatory approach, the use of data and the i-Auditor system will enable officials to assess risks and monitor issues more quickly. Factories that violate pollution control requirements may be ordered to suspend or shut down operations immediately, subject to the powers and conditions prescribed by law.

2026 Performance

In 2026, 767 factories were found to have violated the law, resulting in 131 suspension orders, 636 corrective action orders, and 391 legal proceedings.

The enhancement of i-Auditor under the ONE MIND policy is an important step toward developing a factory oversight system that is faster, more transparent, and traceable. It also supports equal compliance with legal requirements and contributes to raising Thailand’s industrial standards sustainably.

Source: The Nation, August 16, 2026, and the Ministry of Industry

Data from : https://www.thaigov.go.th/th/news/168308

: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/economy/40069853

การฝ่าฝืนข้อกำหนดด้านมลพิษของโรงงานอาจนำไปสู่การสั่งปิดโรงงานได้ทันที ภายใต้ระบบ i-Auditor

2026-09-03T15:43:00+09:00

กระทรวงอุตสาหกรรมปรับการกำกับดูแลโรงงานสู่ Data-Driven Regulation โดยนำข้อมูลและเทคโนโลยีดิจิทัลมาใช้ประเมินความเสี่ยงและระบุความผิดปกติ เพื่อให้การตรวจสอบเป็นไปอย่างตรงจุดและมีประสิทธิภาพมากขึ้น

หนึ่งในเครื่องมือสำคัญคือ i-Auditor ระบบดิจิทัลที่ช่วยให้เจ้าหน้าที่บันทึกผลการตรวจ แนบหลักฐาน จัดทำรายงาน และติดตามการแก้ไขข้อบกพร่องได้อย่างเป็นระบบ ลดการใช้เอกสาร และช่วยให้การตรวจสอบมีมาตรฐานเดียวกันมากขึ้น

โรงงานฝ่าฝืนมาตรฐานมลพิษ อาจถูกสั่งปิดทันที

การเปลี่ยนแปลงที่สำคัญคือการยกระดับการบังคับใช้กฎหมายกับโรงงานที่ ปล่อยมลพิษเกินกว่ามาตรฐานที่กำหนด หรือไม่สามารถจัดการกากอุตสาหกรรมได้อย่างถูกต้อง

ในอดีต หากโรงงานก่อให้เกิดมลพิษจากการปล่อยน้ำเสียหรือมลพิษทางอากาศเกินกว่าค่าที่กฎหมายกำหนด เจ้าหน้าที่กรมโรงงานอุตสาหกรรม (DIW) สามารถมีคำสั่งให้โรงงานดำเนินการแก้ไขภายในระยะเวลาที่กำหนด ตามวรรคหนึ่งของมาตรา 37 แห่งพระราชบัญญัติโรงงาน

ภายใต้แนวทางการกำกับดูแลรูปแบบใหม่ การใช้ข้อมูลและระบบ i-Auditor จะช่วยให้เจ้าหน้าที่สามารถประเมินความเสี่ยงและติดตามปัญหาได้รวดเร็วยิ่งขึ้น โดยโรงงานที่ฝ่าฝืนข้อกำหนดด้านมลพิษอาจ ถูกสั่งหยุดหรือปิดกิจการได้ทันที ตามอำนาจและเงื่อนไขที่กฎหมายกำหนด

ผลการดำเนินงาน ปี 2569

ในปี 2569 พบโรงงานผิดกฎหมาย 767 ราย โดยมีการดำเนินการ ได้แก่ สั่งหยุดกิจการ 131 ราย สั่งปรับปรุงแก้ไข 636 ราย และดำเนินคดี 391 ราย

การยกระดับ i-Auditor ภายใต้นโยบาย ONE MIND จึงเป็นส่วนสำคัญในการพัฒนาระบบกำกับดูแลโรงงานให้มีความ รวดเร็ว โปร่งใส และตรวจสอบย้อนหลังได้ พร้อมส่งเสริมให้ผู้ประกอบการปฏิบัติตามกฎหมายอย่างเท่าเทียม และยกระดับมาตรฐานอุตสาหกรรมไทยอย่างยั่งยืน

ที่มา: The Nation, 16 August 2026 และกระทรวงอุตสาหกรรม

ข้อมูลจาก : https://www.thaigov.go.th/th/news/168308

: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/economy/40069853

Characteristics of Foreign travelers in Thailand from the top 10 countries by month.

2026-08-27T19:15:00+09:00

Prepared by HS-TECH with ggplot2 in positron.

Here is a summary of the characteristics of travelers from the top 10 countries, with detailed insights for Japan, China, the US, and Russia, and concise overviews for the rest based on the data trends from 2018 to 2026.

Japan

Travelers from Japan have shown a steady pattern with notable seasonality, typically peaking slightly in August and December. Pre-2020, annual visitor numbers were around 1.7 to 1.8 million. While the numbers fell sharply during 2020–2021, a gradual recovery began in late 2022. By 2025, annual travelers surpassed 1 million again, though this is still roughly 60% of pre-pandemic levels. The recovery has been relatively cautious compared to other nations, with stable numbers returning but not yet reaching previous highs.

China

China is a massive volume driver, consistently contributing the highest number of travelers. Before 2020, annual arrivals exceeded 11 million. The data reflects a rapid post-2022 rebound, with over 3.5 million arrivals in 2023 and a massive surge to 6.7 million in 2024. Interestingly, this momentum slowed to around 4.4 million in 2025. Chinese travel patterns show strong peaks during early-year holidays (like January) and mid-summer (July/August), demonstrating high sensitivity to major holiday periods.

United States

The US represents a highly stable, long-haul travel market. Before 2020, annual arrivals were consistently around 1.1 to 1.2 million. The recovery here has been robust and rapid; by 2024, the numbers had already bounced back to over 1 million, and by 2025, they were near the 1.1 million mark again. The US shows distinct travel peaks during the winter holidays (December/January), indicating a preference for escaping colder weather or utilizing holiday time for long-distance travel.

Russia

Russia exhibits the most extreme seasonal travel patterns among the top 10 countries. Arrivals skyrocket during the winter months (December through February), with single-month arrivals frequently exceeding 200,000, while summer numbers (June/July) drop drastically to under 80,000. Remarkably, the Russian market recovered rapidly; total arrivals in 2024 (1.74 million) and 2025 (1.89 million) have actually exceeded pre-2020 levels, indicating a very strong and growing preference for winter travel to this destination.

Brief Summaries for Other Nations:

Malaysia: The highest volume driver from neighboring countries, quickly rebounding to pre-pandemic levels (close to 4.9 million in 2024) with relatively stable month-to-month traffic.
India: Showing aggressive growth, exceeding pre-2020 numbers by 2024 and reaching nearly 2.4 million in 2025, driven by steady year-round arrivals.
South Korea: A major contributor (around 2 million pre-2020) that showed a strong initial rebound in 2023–2024, though numbers slightly softened in 2025.
Laos: Represents consistent cross-border traffic, with a solid recovery peaking at 1.1 million in 2024, maintaining steady volumes without extreme seasonal spikes.
Singapore: A very stable market that has largely recovered to its pre-2020 baseline of around 1 million annual travelers, maintaining consistent flow throughout the year.
Vietnam: Demonstrated a strong early recovery in 2023 (over 1 million) but has seen numbers drop significantly in 2025, showing higher volatility compared to other regional neighbors.

ข้อกำหนดใหม่ของ BOI: เงินเดือนแรงงานต่างชาติและสัดส่วนพนักงานไทย 70%

2026-08-21T19:19:00+09:00

ข้อกำหนดใหม่ของ BOI: เงินเดือนแรงงานต่างชาติและสัดส่วนพนักงานไทย 70%

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการส่งเสริมการลงทุน (BOI) ได้กำหนดข้อกำหนดใหม่เกี่ยวกับเงินเดือนขั้นต่ำของบุคลากรต่างชาติและสัดส่วนพนักงานไทย สำหรับโครงการในภาคการผลิตที่ได้รับการส่งเสริมการลงทุนจาก BOI

Figure 1: BOI Requirements

หมายเหตุ: โบนัสและค่าตอบแทนพิเศษ เช่น ค่าตำแหน่ง (Position Allowance) และค่าที่พัก (Housing Benefit/Allowance) สามารถนำมานับรวมในเงินเดือนขั้นต่ำได้ หากระบุจำนวนเงินที่ชัดเจนในสัญญาจ้าง และมีเอกสารหลักฐานตามที่ BOI กำหนด

สัดส่วนพนักงานไทย 70% ของ BOI

ใช้กับ บริษัท BOI ที่เป็นกิจการผลิต (Manufacturing) และมีพนักงาน มากกว่า 100 คน
ต้องมีพนักงานไทย อย่างน้อย 70% ของพนักงานทั้งหมด
ถ้ามีพนักงาน ไม่เกิน 100 คน → ไม่ต้องใช้กฎ 70%
กิจการบริการ ไม่อยู่ภายใต้กฎนี้
ชาวต่างชาติที่เข้ามาทำงานในตำแหน่งที่ได้รับอนุญาตให้อยู่ในไทย ไม่เกิน 6 เดือน ไม่รวมในเงื่อนไขนี้
หากเป็นโครงการ ลงทุนสูง / เทคโนโลยีขั้นสูง / หาคนไทยที่มีคุณสมบัติเหมาะสมไม่ได้ สามารถขอ BOI พิจารณาผ่อนผันหรือยกเว้นเป็นรายกรณีได้

ตัวอย่าง: มีพนักงาน 200 คน → ต้องมีคนไทยอย่างน้อย 140 คน

วันที่เริ่มบังคับใช้

โครงการ BOI ที่ได้รับอนุมัติตั้งแต่ 5 มิถุนายน 2568 เป็นต้นไป → ใช้หลักเกณฑ์ใหม่ตั้งแต่ 1 ตุลาคม 2568

โครงการ BOI ที่ได้รับอนุมัติก่อน 5 มิถุนายน 2568 → ใช้หลักเกณฑ์ใหม่ตั้งแต่ 1 มกราคม 2569

หลักเกณฑ์ใหม่ของ BOI มีเป้าหมายเพื่อส่งเสริมการจ้างงานคนไทยและยกระดับการใช้บุคลากรต่างชาติให้สอดคล้องกับความต้องการของโครงการลงทุน บริษัทที่ได้รับการส่งเสริมจาก BOI ควรตรวจสอบ ระดับตำแหน่งและรายได้ของบุคลากรต่างชาติ รวมถึงสัดส่วนพนักงานไทย ให้เป็นไปตามหลักเกณฑ์ใหม่ภายในระยะเวลาที่กำหนด

ทั้งนี้ รายละเอียดและข้อยกเว้นอาจแตกต่างกันตามประเภทกิจการและเงื่อนไขของแต่ละโครงการ บริษัทจึงควรตรวจสอบกับ BOI หรือหน่วยงานที่เกี่ยวข้อง ก่อนดำเนินการ เพื่อให้การปฏิบัติเป็นไปอย่างถูกต้องและลดความเสี่ยงด้านกฎระเบียบ

แหล่งข้อมูล: สำนักงานคณะกรรมการส่งเสริมการลงทุน (BOI), ประกาศสำนักงานคณะกรรมการส่งเสริมการลงทุนที่ ป. 8/2568

ลิงก์: เอกสาร FAQ ของ BOI เรื่องหลักเกณฑ์การจ้างงานบุคลากรต่างชาติ

(BEE)

New BOI Requirements: Minimum Salary for Foreign Workers and 70% Thai Employee Ratio

2026-08-21T18:40:00+09:00

boi-requirements-eng

The Board of Investment (BOI) has introduced new requirements concerning the minimum salary for foreign personnel and the Thai employee ratio for projects in the manufacturing sector that receive BOI investment promotion.

Figure 1: BOI Salary Requirements

Note: Bonuses and special remuneration, such as position allowances and housing benefits/allowances, may be counted toward the minimum salary requirement, provided that the exact amounts are clearly specified in the employment contract and supported by the required documentation as stipulated by the BOI.

70% Thai Employee Ratio under BOI

Applies to BOI-promoted manufacturing companies with more than 100 employees.
At least 70% of the total workforce must be Thai nationals.
Companies with 100 employees or fewer → are not subject to the 70% rule.
Service businesses are not subject to this requirement.
Foreign workers in positions that are permitted to stay in Thailand for no more than 6 months are not included in this requirement.
Projects involving high-value investment / advanced technology / difficulties in recruiting suitably qualified Thai employees may apply to the BOI for case-by-case consideration for an exemption or relaxation of the requirement.

Example: If a company has 200 employees → at least 140 employees must be Thai nationals.

Effective Date

BOI projects approved on or after June 5, 2025 → The new requirements apply from October 1, 2025.
BOI projects approved before June 5, 2025 → The new requirements apply from January 1, 2026.

The new BOI requirements aim to promote employment of Thai nationals and ensure that the employment of foreign personnel is aligned with the needs of investment projects. BOI-promoted companies should review the positions and income of foreign personnel, as well as the proportion of Thai employees, to ensure compliance with the new requirements within the applicable timeframe.

The specific requirements and exemptions may vary depending on the type of business and the conditions of each BOI project. Companies should therefore consult the BOI or relevant authorities before taking action to ensure compliance and minimize regulatory risks.

Source: Thailand Board of Investment (BOI), BOI Notification No. Por. 8/2568 and related FAQ.

Link: BOI FAQ – Employment Conditions for Foreign Personnel

Prepared by Bee

Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) by World Bank Region and OECD Membership, 2024

2026-08-16T18:44:00+09:00

Summary statistics

CPI (0-100 scale) by World Bank region and OECD membership, 2024
Region (World Bank)	OECD member	n	Mean	Median	SD	Min	Max
East Asia and Pacific (WB)	Yes	4	73.8	74.0	8.1	64	83
East Asia and Pacific (WB)	No	19	42.3	40.0	18.3	15	84
Europe and Central Asia (WB)	Yes	27	66.3	67.0	14.5	34	90
Europe and Central Asia (WB)	No	22	37.3	40.0	11.0	17	56
Latin America and Caribbean (WB)	Yes	4	46.5	48.5	17.1	26	63
Latin America and Caribbean (WB)	No	26	39.4	36.5	17.6	10	76
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan and Pakistan (WB)	Yes	1	64.0	64.0	NA	64	64
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan and Pakistan (WB)	No	21	36.1	34.0	16.9	12	68
North America (WB)	Yes	2	70.0	70.0	7.1	65	75
South Asia (WB)	No	6	39.5	36.0	16.8	23	72
Sub-Saharan Africa (WB)	No	48	32.5	31.0	13.8	8	72

Distribution by region

Key observations

Across all regions, OECD members score substantially higher on the CPI (mean 65.1, median 66, n = 38) than non-members (mean 36.7, median 34, n = 142).
Europe and Central Asia has by far the largest OECD cohort (27 countries) and the widest internal spread – from Denmark (90) to Turkey (34) – so membership alone does not guarantee a very high score.
East Asia and Pacific shows the cleanest separation: all 4 OECD members (New Zealand, Australia, Japan, South Korea) score well above the regional non-member average.
Latin America and the Caribbean has the smallest OECD/non-OECD gap (46.5 vs. 39.4); Mexico (26) scores below several non-member countries in the same region.
South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, and (aside from Israel) the Middle East/North Africa/Afghanistan/Pakistan grouping have no OECD members in this dataset. Sub-Saharan Africa has both the lowest regional mean (32.5) and the largest sample (48 countries).
North America has no non-OECD entries – both countries in that World Bank grouping (Canada, United States) are OECD members.

Data source

Corruption Perceptions Index: Transparency International, CPI 2024.
Regional classification: World Bank region groups.

世界銀行地域区分およびOECD加盟状況別腐敗認識指数（CPI）、2024年

2026-08-15T16:01:00+09:00

集計結果

地域別・OECD加盟状況別CPI（0〜100点、2024年）
地域（世界銀行区分）	OECD加盟状況	n	平均	中央値	標準偏差	最小	最大
サブサハラアフリカ	非加盟	48	32.5	31.0	13.8	8	72
中南米・カリブ	非加盟	26	39.4	36.5	17.6	10	76
中南米・カリブ	加盟	4	46.5	48.5	17.1	26	63
中東・北アフリカ・アフガニスタン・パキスタン	非加盟	21	36.1	34.0	16.9	12	68
中東・北アフリカ・アフガニスタン・パキスタン	加盟	1	64.0	64.0	NA	64	64
北米	加盟	2	70.0	70.0	7.1	65	75
南アジア	非加盟	6	39.5	36.0	16.8	23	72
東アジア・太平洋	非加盟	19	42.3	40.0	18.3	15	84
東アジア・太平洋	加盟	4	73.8	74.0	8.1	64	83
欧州・中央アジア	非加盟	22	37.3	40.0	11.0	17	56
欧州・中央アジア	加盟	27	66.3	67.0	14.5	34	90

地域別分布

特筆事項

全地域を通じて、OECD加盟国のCPI平均は65.1（中央値66、n=38）、非加盟国は平均36.7（中央値34、n=142）と、加盟国が顕著に高いスコアを示す。
欧州・中央アジアはOECD加盟国数が突出して多く（27カ国）、域内のばらつきも最大（デンマーク90点〜トルコ34点）。加盟国であることが高スコアを保証するわけではない。
東アジア・太平洋は加盟・非加盟の分離が最も明瞭で、OECD加盟4カ国（ニュージーランド、オーストラリア、日本、韓国）はいずれも非加盟国平均を大きく上回る。
中南米・カリブはOECD/非OECDの差が最小（46.5対39.4）。メキシコ（26点）は同地域の一部の非加盟国より低いスコア。
南アジア、サブサハラアフリカ、および中東・北アフリカ・アフガニスタン・パキスタン（イスラエルを除く）は本データセット上、OECD加盟国がゼロ。サブサハラアフリカは地域平均が最も低く（32.5）、サンプル数も最大（48カ国）。
北米は非加盟国が存在せず、当該世界銀行区分の2カ国（カナダ・米国）はいずれもOECD加盟国。

データソース

腐敗認識指数（CPI）：Transparency International、CPI 2024
地域区分：世界銀行（World Bank）地域グループ

Corruption Perceptions Index, CPI and Thailand , 2024

2026-08-13T16:27:00+09:00

Prepared by HS-TECH with ggplot2, r and positron

Thailand had a score of 34 in the non-OECD members, the same score as Turkey, which ranked second worst among OECD member countries. Eradicating corruption is one of the bottlenecks for countries like Thailand that aim to become new members of the OECD.

OECD members, Mexico and Turkey have long been required to make improvements as their CPI ranks at the bottom among OECD member countries, but no significant measures to prevent corruption appear to have been implemented.

Corruption Perceptions Index is expressed as a number from 0 to 100, with 100 points indicating the least corruption.

Initiatives to combat corruption in Thailand

2026-08-11T17:51:00+09:00

July 23 2026 – First Meeting of the Anti-Corruption Coordination Committee (KTT):

The government moved forward with measures to combat bribery and corruption, promoted the “One Department, One Transparency” policy, established subcommittees to drive anti-corruption efforts, and strengthened cooperation between the public and private sectors.

Link : https://www.thaigov.go.th/th/news/166801?utm_source=chatgpt.com

August 5 2026 – Closed-door Dialogue:

The Zero Corruption: JSCCIB and Friends working group, together with the Thailand Institute of Justice (TIJ), held a closed-door dialogue to discuss structural corruption issues and exchange practical solutions among government, private sector, academia, and other relevant stakeholders.

Link : https://www.jsccib.org/news/detail/public-private-civil-society-dialogue-anti-corruption-data-transparency-oecd

JSCCIB: Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking

HS-TECH ENGINEERING Contributes Article to the Japanese Monthly Chemical Management Journal

2026-08-10T12:40:00+09:00

HS-TECH ENGINEERING has contributed an article to the July 2026 issue of Chemical Substances Management, a monthly journal published by Johokiko Co., Ltd., Tokyo, titled "Thailand's Path Toward OECD Accession: An Analysis of the Sweeping Reform of Its Chemical Regulatory Framework." The issue is scheduled for release on July 8.

Contents

1. Introduction

2. Thailand's Efforts Toward OECD Accession

3. The Five Pillars of Chemical Regulatory Reform (Background, Current Status, and Direction of Reform)

3-1 Full Alignment with GHS (Complete Transition to the Latest Revision)
3-2 Establishment of a National Chemical Inventory and Integration of the Underlying Data Infrastructure
3-3 Modernization of Chemical Storage Standards (Harmonization with International Norms)
3-4 Introduction of a PRTR System
3-5 Rigorous Implementation of Process Safety Management (PSM)

4. Sector-by-Sector Qualitative Impact Analysis and the Positioning of the Chemical and Materials Industries

5. Precedents from Prior OECD Accessions

6. Thailand's Anticipated OECD Accession Process

7. Conclusion

Inquiries

https://hstecheng.com/contact

บริการจัดทำเอกสารข้อมูลความปลอดภัยสารเคมี อย่างมืออาชีพ โดย HS-TECH Engineering

2026-08-05T19:02:00+09:00

แม่แบบ: SDS_TH_HS-TECH_ 05082026_1.pdf (0.15MB)

HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd. ให้บริการจัดทำเอกสารข้อมูลความปลอดภัยสารเคมี (Thai Safety Data Sheet: SDS) อย่างมืออาชีพ เพื่อช่วยให้ผลิตภัณฑ์เคมีของคุณเป็นไปตามข้อกำหนดของกฎหมายไทย เอกสาร SDS ทุกฉบับจัดทำตามระบบการจำแนกและการติดฉลากสารเคมีสากล (GHS) และข้อกำหนดทางกฎหมายของประเทศไทย เพื่อรองรับการนำเข้า การผลิต และการจำหน่ายผลิตภัณฑ์เคมี พร้อมช่วยลดความเสี่ยงด้านการปฏิบัติตามกฎระเบียบและส่งเสริมความปลอดภัยในการทำงาน
เอกสาร SDS ทุกฉบับจัดทำและตรวจสอบโดยผู้เชี่ยวชาญที่มีประสบการณ์ด้านกฎระเบียบสารเคมีและกฎหมายความปลอดภัย เรามุ่งมั่นส่งมอบเอกสารที่ถูกต้อง ครบถ้วน และเชื่อถือได้ตามมาตรฐานสากล บริการของเราครอบคลุมการจัดทำ การแปล การปรับปรุงเอกสาร SDS และการให้คำปรึกษาด้านกฎระเบียบ เพื่อช่วยให้ธุรกิจของคุณสามารถปฏิบัติตามข้อกำหนดทางกฎหมายได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ
ด้วยการให้บริการที่รวดเร็ว ความเชี่ยวชาญระดับมืออาชีพ และบริการที่เชื่อถือได้ HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd. พร้อมเป็นพันธมิตรที่คุณไว้วางใจด้านเอกสารข้อมูลความปลอดภัยสารเคมี เรามุ่งมั่นช่วยให้ธุรกิจของคุณดำเนินงานได้อย่างมั่นใจ เป็นไปตามข้อกำหนดของกฎหมาย และพร้อมตอบสนองความต้องการด้านการกำกับดูแลสารเคมี ติดต่อเราได้วันนี้เพื่อสอบถามข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับบริการจัดทำ Thai Safety Data Sheet (SDS) ของเรา

Related information:

https://hstecheng.com/free/thaisds

https://hstecheng.com/info/5479008

CONTACT: https://hstecheng.com/contact

Professional Thai Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Preparation Services by HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd.

2026-08-05T18:51:00+09:00

A template of Thai SDS

SDS_TH_HS-TECH_ 05082026_1.pdf (0.15MB)

HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd. provides professional Thai Safety Data Sheet (SDS) preparation services to help ensure your chemical products comply with Thai regulations. Our SDS documents are prepared in accordance with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) and applicable Thai legal requirements, supporting the import, manufacture, and distribution of chemical products while reducing regulatory risks and promoting workplace safety.

Each SDS is prepared and reviewed by experienced specialists with expertise in chemical regulations and safety legislation. We are committed to delivering accurate, complete, and reliable documentation that meets international standards. Our services include SDS preparation, translation, revision, and regulatory support to help your business comply with legal requirements efficiently.
With fast turnaround times, professional expertise, and dependable service, HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd. is your trusted partner for chemical safety documentation. We are dedicated to helping your business achieve regulatory compliance and operate with confidence. Contact us today to learn more about our professional Thai SDS services.

Related information:

https://hstecheng.com/free/thaisds

https://hstecheng.com/info/5479008

CONTACT: https://hstecheng.com/contact

Thailand Province-Level Analysis: GPP per Capita vs. Life Expectancy (2020) and Suicide Rate (2019)

2026-07-15T15:27:00+09:00

Thailand Province-Level Analysis

Author

Affiliation

Sasiton Treeprak, Sciences Manager

HS-TECH Engineering

This report summarizes two province-level scatter analyses relating Gross Provincial Product (GPP) per capita to two health outcomes: life expectancy at birth (2020) and suicide rate (2019). Both analyses cover all 77 Thai provinces.

1 GPP per Capita vs. Life Expectancy (2020)

Overall correlation: Pearson r ≈ -0.36 (n = 77 provinces) — a weak-to-moderate negative relationship. Higher GPP per capita is associated with slightly lower life expectancy across provinces.

Figure 1: GPP per capita (2020) vs. life expectancy (2020), clustered by region-group

1.1 By 8 Regions

Table 1: Mean GPP and Life Expectancy

Region group	Mean GPP/capita (Baht)	Life expectancy (yrs)
Bangkok	585,689	74.7
East	353,730	75
Central	214,621	75.1
North	105,101	75.7
Perimeter	277,842	76.1
Northeast	80,127	76.5
West	155,443	77
South	136,596	77.8

1.2 Key observations

The richest provinces — Rayong, Bangkok, Prachin Buri (all industrial / Eastern-seaboard) — sit at the lowest life-expectancy tier.
The South and Northeast — lower-GPP regions — have the highest average life expectancy.

1.3 Note

Important data limitation: life expectancy is only published at the regional level (8 groups) by NESDB/NSO for 2020, not by individual province. Every province in the same region-group shares an identical assigned value, so this correlation reflects a regional pattern rather than true province-specific variation.

2 GPP per Capita vs. Suicide Rate (2019)

Overall correlation: Pearson r ≈ -0.20 (log GPP, n = 77 provinces) — a weak negative relationship. Higher GPP per capita is associated with slightly lower suicide rate.

Figure 2: GPP per capita (2019, log scale) vs. suicide rate (2019)

2.1 By 6 regions

Table 2: Mean GPP and Suicide

Region	Mean GPP/capita (Baht)	Suicide rate (per 100,000)
Bangkok & Vicinities	352,508	4.11 (lowest)
Southern	162,237	6.1
Western	191,117	6.15
Eastern	395,695	6.9
Northeastern	79,897	6.94
Northern	109,503	9.33 (highest)

2.2 Key observations

Bangkok & Vicinities (highest GPP) has the lowest suicide rate, consistent with the overall negative trend.
The Northern region is a clear outlier: it has only middling GPP but the highest suicide rates — Nan, Phrae, and Lamphun all exceed 11 per 100,000.
The Northeast, despite being the poorest region by GPP, is mid-pack for suicide rate, not the worst — breaking a simple “poorer means higher risk” story.
Southern provinces — Narathiwat, Pattani, Yala — have the lowest suicide rates in the country (under 2.5), despite modest GPP, likely reflecting cultural/religious factors in this majority-Muslim region rather than economic conditions.
Suicide rate 2019 was computed from raw counts: (male deaths + female deaths) / (male population + female population) × 100,000, combining both sexes rather than averaging published sex-specific rates.

3 Combining the Two Analyses

Both relationships point in the same direction — provinces with higher GPP per capita trend toward a slightly lower suicide rate, but slightly lower (not higher) life expectancy. However, neither relationship is strong: r² is approximately 13% for life expectancy and 4% for suicide rate, meaning GPP per capita explains only a small share of the variation in either outcome.
The life-expectancy result is likely confounded by industrial and environmental exposure in high-GPP Eastern-seaboard provinces. The suicide-rate pattern is dominated by a distinct Northern-region effect that overwhelms any simple wealth-based explanation. GPP per capita should be treated as a weak, non-causal predictor for either outcome on its own — other factors (healthcare access, environmental exposure, culture, religion, urbanization, and reporting practices) likely play a larger role.

Note: Note: This is a descriptive, exploratory summary intended to surface patterns for further investigation — not a causal or policy analysis.

Gross Provincial Product (GPP) per Capita: A Reflection of Thailand's Regional Economic Performance

2026-07-13T17:29:00+09:00

Gross Provincial Product (GPP) per capita is a key indicator of the average economic output per person in each province and is widely used to compare regional economic performance across Thailand.
Analysis of data for the period 2018–2024 indicates that Rayong consistently recorded the highest GPP per capita, driven by its concentration of petrochemical industries, oil refineries, and automotive manufacturing, which form the core of Thailand's Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). Bangkok ranked second, reflecting its role as the country's principal centre for business, finance, trade, and services.
Provinces with well-developed industrial bases and major economic zones, including Chon Buri, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Samut Sakhon, and Pathum Thani, generally recorded medium to high levels of GPP per capita. In contrast, many provinces in the Northeastern region and parts of Northern Thailand, where economic activity is more heavily dependent on agriculture, exhibited relatively lower levels of GPP per capita.
These findings highlight the considerable variation in economic performance across provinces, reflecting differences in industrial structure, investment, and productivity. GPP per capita serves as a valuable indicator for regional economic analysis and provides an important evidence base for investment planning, business strategy, and the formulation of regional development policies.

(Bee)

都県別人口増減

2026-07-08T13:30:00+09:00

タイ王国地域別・県別人口動態

地域別の人口増減

東部：突出して増加（２０１３年から２０２５年で１９％増）は、東部経済回廊への産業集積が牽引
バンコク首都圏、南部：緩やかに増加（+5〜6%）。ただしバンコク都心自体は人口減少が続き、周辺県（サムットプラーカーン、ノンタブリー、パトゥムタニー）への郊外流出が実態
東北部・北部・西部: 緩やかな減少基調（-2〜3%）。地方の高齢化・都市部への転出が背景。

都県別の伸び率トップ５（直近５年間の年平均複利成長率）

都県	地域	伸び率（％）
Rayong	Eastern	1.41
Pathum Thani	Pathum Thani	1.31
Chonburi	Eastern	1.23
Tak	Northern	1.08
Phuket	Southern	0.98

都県別減少率トップ５

都県	地域	伸び率（％）
Phrae	Northern	▲ 0.91
Lampang	Northern	▲ 0.89
Samut Songkhram	Western	▲ 0.73
Uttaradit	Northern	▲ 0.71
Singburi	Western	▲ 0.70

タイの都県別人口推移（改訂版）

2026-07-07T18:59:00+09:00

タイ国都県別人口推移 (2013-2035年)

開始年: 終了年: 地域:

検索:

※ 2026年以降（*印・薄色セル）は各都県の2020-2025年の実績トレンド（年平均成長率）をもとに機械的に延長した推計値です。出生・死亡・移動を年齢階層別に積み上げる公式の人口推計（NESDCやUN Population Divisionのコホート要因法）ではないため、参考値です。

We are experts in preparing Thai Safety Data Sheets.

2026-06-19T13:30:00+09:00

Thailand enforces strict SDS compliance under the Hazardous Substances Act B.E. 2535/ Factory Act and Ministry of Industry notifications.

19June_Thai Safety Data Sheet.pdf (0.45MB)

CONTACT: https://hstecheng.com/contact

language: Thai, English and Japanese

Efforts to Eradicate Corruption in Thai Government Agencies

2026-06-16T16:46:00+09:00

According to the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)—an annual metric published by the international NGO, Transparency International that quantifies the perceived level of public sector corruption globally—Thailand scored 33 out of 100 in 2025. This places the country at 116th overall, marking its lowest ranking since 2012 [1]. For context, India ranked 91st with a score of 39 in 2025.

Meanwhile, on May 14, 2026, the Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking (JSCCIB), Thailand released a list of the top 10 government agencies with the highest bribe amounts per transaction, marking the first time such data has been made public [2].

During a press conference, a named Thai government　agency pushed back against the JSCCIB's results, demanding to see the underlying data and evidence to support these claims [3].

With technical reviews by 20 OECD committees rapidly approaching as part of Thailand's bid for OECD membership, movements among key stakeholders to address these issues are intensifying.

Corruption Rankings of ASEAN Countries (2025)

#116: Ranked 116th

Prepared by HS-TECH with leaflet/ggplot2

What is the JSCCIB?

The Joint Standing Committee on Commerce, Industry and Banking (JSCCIB) is the leading body of Thailand’s private sector, comprising the Thai Chamber of Commerce, the Federation of Thai Industries, and the Thai Bankers' Association. It plays a pivotal role in shaping economic policies and improving the business environment in collaboration with the Thai government.

Currently, the JSCCIB is crucial to Thailand’s bid to join the OECD. As OECD membership requires stringent adherence to international standards of governance and legal frameworks, the JSCCIB actively champions initiatives like "Zero Corruption Thailand" to promote transparency and ethical business practices. By conducting surveys and providing policy recommendations, the JSCCIB supports the government's structural reforms to enhance public sector integrity, ensuring Thailand's investment climate meets global standards.

(Hashi, Bee)

References:

[1] https://www.jsccib.org/news/detail/jsccib-private-sector-survey-corruption-worsens-zero-corruption-thailand

[2] https://www.nationthailand.com/business/economy/40066227

[3] https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2026/05/16/thailand039s-pollution-control-department-chief-rejects-bribery-claims-demands-survey-source

HS-TECH ENGINEERING Co., Ltd.

Why Choose Us: Our Competitive Edge in Thai Regulatory Monitoring

Tier 1: Static Monitoring

Tier 2: Dynamic Exploration

Tier 3: Expert Validation

Get in Touch.

Is Your SDS Up to Standard? Let Us Review It.

A shocking and intolerable level of SDS quality

Thai SDS Template is now available

Thai SDS Authoring Services

7 ปี กากอุตสาหกรรมไทย เปลี่ยนแปลงอย่างไร?

7 Years of Thailand’s Industrial Waste: How Has It Changed?

Thailand PRTR Act directly affects compliance with the Public Health Act (Revised)

Thailand PRTR Act, drafted and public consultation until September 30th

A public consultation for the enactment of the new “PRTR (Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) Act,” which is a prerequisite for OECD membership, is open from August 10 to September 30, 2026, at the following website: https://ethics.parliament.go.th/section77/survey_detail.php?id=614 .

1. Key Points of the Draft PRTR Act (Basic Law)

Covered Facilities

Reporting Obligations

Public Disclosure

Protection of Trade Secrets

Penalties

2. Impact on Chemical Handling Businesses (Factories)

Increased Compliance and Operational Costs

Reputation Risks from Public Disclosure

Strict Obligations for Intellectual Property Protection

Severe Legal Risks for Management (Urgent Need to Strengthen Governance)

3. Pending Clarifications (Unconfirmed Matters)

Target Pollutants

Definition of Target Facilities

4. Implementation Timeline

5. Transitional Measures

OECD加盟に向けた新たな”PRTR法案”のパブリックコメント募集(9月30日まで）

PRTR法案（基本法）の要点

対象となる事業者

報告義務

情報公開

営業秘密の保護

罰則

化学物質取扱事業者（工場）へのインパクト

コンプライアンスおよび運用コストの増大

情報公開に伴うレピュテーションリスク

知的財産保護の徹底義務

経営層の重い法的リスク（ガバナンス強化の急務）

未確認事項

対象となる汚染物質

対象事業所の定義

施行時期

経過措置

対象となる可能性のある汚染物質および化学物質（過去からの参考）

OEDC加盟に向けた、危険物貯蔵施設に関する調査(タイ工業省 産業規制局: DIW)

タイは2028年末までのOECD加盟を目指し、包括的な法制度改革を加速させています。HS-TECHエンジニアリングは、日本の化学物質管理専門の月刊誌に寄稿した記事にて、こうした一連の取り組みを詳しく紹介しました。

Hazardous Materials Storage Facility Survey by The Department of Industrial Works, DIW Thailand

A shocking and intolerable level of SDS quality

目を覆う看過できないSDS品質レベル

Request on Quotation / SDS preparation for clients

Pollution breaches by factory could bring immediate shutdowns the factory under the new i-Auditor

การฝ่าฝืนข้อกำหนดด้านมลพิษของโรงงานอาจนำไปสู่การสั่งปิดโรงงานได้ทันที ภายใต้ระบบ i-Auditor

Characteristics of Foreign travelers in Thailand from the top 10 countries by month.

ข้อกำหนดใหม่ของ BOI: เงินเดือนแรงงานต่างชาติและสัดส่วนพนักงานไทย 70%

New BOI Requirements: Minimum Salary for Foreign Workers and 70% Thai Employee Ratio

Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) by World Bank Region and OECD Membership, 2024

Summary statistics

Distribution by region

Key observations

Data source

世界銀行地域区分およびOECD加盟状況別 腐敗認識指数（CPI）、2024年

地域別分布

特筆事項

データソース

Corruption Perceptions Index, CPI and Thailand , 2024

Initiatives to combat corruption in Thailand

HS-TECH ENGINEERING Contributes Article to the Japanese Monthly Chemical Management Journal

บริการจัดทำเอกสารข้อมูลความปลอดภัยสารเคมี อย่างมืออาชีพ โดย HS-TECH Engineering

Professional Thai Safety Data Sheet (SDS) Preparation Services by HS-TECH Engineering Co., Ltd.

Thailand Province-Level Analysis: GPP per Capita vs. Life Expectancy (2020) and Suicide Rate (2019)

1 GPP per Capita vs. Life Expectancy (2020)

1.1 By 8 Regions

1.2 Key observations

1.3 Note

2 GPP per Capita vs. Suicide Rate (2019)

A public consultation for the enactment of the new “PRTR (Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) Act,” which is a prerequisite for OECD membership, is open from August 10 to September 30, 2026, at the following website: https://ethics.parliament.go.th/section77/survey_detail.php?id=614　　.

1. Key Points of the Draft PRTR Act (Basic Law)　　

Reporting Obligations　　

Public Disclosure　　

Protection of Trade Secrets　　

Penalties　　

2. Impact on Chemical Handling Businesses (Factories)　　

Increased Compliance and Operational Costs　　

Reputation Risks from Public Disclosure　　

Strict Obligations for Intellectual Property Protection　　

Severe Legal Risks for Management (Urgent Need to Strengthen Governance)　　

3. Pending Clarifications (Unconfirmed Matters)　　

Target Pollutants　　

Definition of Target Facilities　　

4. Implementation Timeline　　

5. Transitional Measures　　

OEDC加盟に向けた、危険物貯蔵施設に関する調査(タイ工業省産業規制局: DIW)

世界銀行地域区分およびOECD加盟状況別腐敗認識指数（CPI）、2024年

タイ国都県別人口推移 (2013-2035年)